Microbiology Nuts & Bolts
  • Home
  • Basic Concepts
    • What is infection?
    • Normal flora
    • Diagnosing infection
  • Microbiology
    • Basic bacterial identification
    • Interpreting bacteriology results
    • Interpreting serology results
  • Infection Control
    • What is infection control?
    • Universal precautions
    • MRSA
    • Clostridium difficile
  • Clinical Scenarios
    • Respiratory infections
    • Urinary infections
    • GI infections >
      • D&V
      • CDAD
    • CNS infections
    • Skin & bone infections
    • Sepsis
  • Antibiotics
    • Antimicrobial Stewardship
    • How antibiotics work
    • How to choose an antibiotic?
    • Reviewing antibiotics
    • Antibiotic resistance
    • Testing antibiotic resistance
    • Penicillin allergy
    • Theraputic Drug Monitoring
  • Guidelines
  • Lectures & Lecture Notes
    • Medical Students
    • Curriculum for the Foundation Program
    • Foundation Year 1
    • Foundation Year 2
    • Other Lectures
  • The Bug Blog
  • Buy the book...
  • NEW Edition Updates
  • Peer Reviews
  • Our Facebook page
  • Want to know more?
  • Contact

How do you cure water on the lungs? Give a tap on the chest (ho ho ho!)

11/1/2018

 
On my way around the wards recently I was asked a question that had me stumped. The respiratory doctors were looking after a patient who they thought either had tuberculosis or lung cancer. The patient had a pleural effusion and the doctors asked “what is the test that distinguishes between tuberculosis (TB) and malignancy?”

My first response to this was to talk about microbiology tests such as microscopy and culture but the doctors quickly stopped me waffling on.

“No, no” they said, “what’s the biochemistry test?”

I didn’t know. I could use the excuse that I’m not a Biochemist but I could see that that was not going to be good enough; I’m a Microbiologist so tuberculosis is in my field of expertise.

I clearly had some reading to do! So I made a promise to write a blog on the answer. Well here you go Kate, here’s your blog… and thanks for the question, it’s always great to learn something new…
Picture
A pleural effusion is a collection of fluid in the space between the lung surface and the inside of the thorax. The tissue covering these surfaces is called the pleura, and a collection of fluid in an anatomical space is called an effusion, hence the term pleural effusion.
 
The main clinical conundrum where pleural effusions are concerned is working out the cause. There are lots of possible causes but most are rare. The most common differential diagnosis includes:
  • Heart failure
  • Infection (including TB)
  • Malignancy
 
Less common causes include:
  • Connective tissue disorders e.g. Lupus, rheumatoid disease
  • Lymphatic abnormalities e.g. disruption of the thoracic duct allowing chyle to leak into the chest (chyle: Greek for “juice”, a milky bodily fluid consisting of lymph and emulsified fats. It is formed in the small intestine during digestion of fatty foods, and taken up by lacteals or lymph vessels)
  • Iatrogenic causes (caused by doctors) e.g. damage to the oesophagus during endoscopy
  • Movement of fluid from below the diaphragm e.g. severe ascites tracking up into the chest
 
But let’s concentrate on the three most common. So how do you tell them apart? This includes a careful clinical history, an examination of the patient and eventually taking a sample of the fluid for laboratory analysis.
 
Clinical History
The first step in investigating any differential diagnosis is to take a full clinical history of the patient’s presenting complaint. It may sound too simple but more than 90% of diagnoses are made from the patient’s own story of what is happening; the examination and investigations are there to prove or disprove the most likely diagnosis.
 
All patients with pleural effusions eventually have shortness of breath, a cough and fast breathing (tachypnoea), but there are other factors in the history that may help decipher the underlying cause. For a pleural effusion the factors in the clinical history that might suggest a particular diagnosis are:
Heart failure
Known ischaemic heart disease, breathlessness on minimal exertion or when lying flat, coughing out frothy white sputum (oedema fluid from the lungs)
Infection 
Sweats, chills, aches, chest pain, coughing out purulent sputum, chronic lung disease e.g. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Malignancy
Weight loss, coughing out blood (haemoptysis), smoker, exposure to asbestos or other carcinogens
Clinical Examination
The clinical examination can help to add more weight to one diagnosis over another. The key points in the clinical examination include:
Heart failure
Pitting oedema in the legs (fluid in the legs which when pushed leaves a temporary “dent” in the patients tissue), crackles at the lung bases not cleared by coughing (pulmonary oedema), raised jugular venous pressure
Infection 
Fever, bronchial breathing (sounds from the bronchi and bronchioles being transmitted to the chest wall by consolidated lung)
Malignancy
Muscle wasting (cachexia)
The problem with using clinical history and examination to differentiate the cause of a pleural effusion is that the diagnoses can overlap. Both heart failure and malignancy can predispose to infection, and because all three diagnoses are relatively common it is possible for a patient with heart failure to develop cancer even though it is unrelated to their ischaemic heart disease.
 
So the next step is to take some of the pleural fluid out of the patient and analyse it in a laboratory.
 
Laboratory analysis
Thoracocentesis is the technical term for the medical procedure where a needle is inserted into the pleural space and fluid withdrawn. If the effusion is so large that it is causing significant symptoms in the patient a drain may be left in place to remove more of the fluid, not just the small amount needed for further investigations.
 
At least three samples should be taken with about 20-25mls of fluid into three separate sterile universals. A quick look at the sample can spot if it is think and green and full of pus, in which case it is an empyema and the patient has an infection.
 
The samples are then sent to the biochemistry, microbiology and cytology laboratories.
 
Biochemistry
The first step in laboratory analysis of a pleural effusion is to decide if the fluid is a transudate or an exudate. A transudate occurs because the hydrostatic or osmotic fluid pressure in the blood stream or other body fluid increases forcing fluid into the lower pressure pleural space; transudates occur with heart failure. An exudate occurs due to inflammation or abnormal tissue drawing fluid into the pleural space; exudates occur with infection and malignancy.
 
Biochemistry laboratories do this by measuring the protein, cholesterol and Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH) in the fluid. An exudate is defined as a pleural fluid that meets 1 of the 3 criteria:
  • Protein >2.9g/L
  • Cholesterol >45mg/L (1.165 mmol/L)
  • LDH >1.45x the laboratory upper limit for serum LDH
 
If the values are close to the cut offs above then transudates and exudates may be misclassified so it is probably sensible to keep an open mind in these cases and maybe repeat the thoracocentesis if the diagnosis is unclear.
 
Microbiology
The microbiology laboratory will look at the number and type of white blood cells in the pleural fluid as well as doing a Gram’s stain for bacteria, a Ziehl-Neelson (ZN) stain for tuberculosis and a bacterial culture.
 
If the pleural fluid is full of neutrophil polymorphs and a bacterium is seen on microscopy then the patient has an infection; the diagnosis is pneumonia with or without an empyema. If the pleural fluid is full of lymphocytes and a mycobacterium is seen on ZN stain then the diagnosis is tuberculosis.
 
If no bacteria are seen the diagnosis is less certain and therefore a positive culture is required to confirm the presence of an infection, the bacteria most likely to cause an infected pleural effusion are Streptococcus pneumonia, Streptococcus anginosus, Staphylococcus aureus or Haemophilus influenzae. A positive mycobacterial culture clinches the diagnosis of tuberculosis but this usually takes up to two weeks.
 
But problems occur when the sample is full of lymphocytes and no organisms are seen… could this still be tuberculosis or is it cancer? If the diagnosis is urgent, i.e. treatment is needed as soon as possible other tests are required… bring on the very small speciality of cytology.
 
Cytology
The cytology laboratory looks at the types of cells in the pleural fluid sample and also looks to see if they have features of cancerous cells. The cytology laboratory can also help with the diagnosis of infection as they can see what type of white blood cells are present and whether they are reacting to a stimulus e.g. infection. They can also look for molecules on the cell walls which are associated with various diseases including cancer and connective tissue disorders.
 
Cytological analysis is not 100% for diagnosing cancer (in fact it’s between 60-75%) so there are still some patients where the differential diagnosis is still tuberculosis or cancer.
 
Other tests
So this brings me back to the question from the respiratory doctors about what is the chemical test that can help diagnose tuberculosis?
 
It turns out that there is another biochemical test which can help distinguish between tuberculosis and malignancy but only in the context of a lymphocytic exudative pleural effusion. The test is for adenosine deaminase (ADA). I don’t think this is a particularly new test but I’d never heard of it.
 
ADA is an enzyme involved in the breakdown of the nucleotide adenine (via adenosine). ADA is produced when lymphocytes are activated in the immune response to intracellular infections. Mycobacterium tuberculosis is an intracellular bacterium and so in tuberculosis ADA is produced in large amounts; whereas in malignancy it isn’t.
 
ADA in pleural fluid can be measured and is much quicker than culture for tuberculosis or cytology for malignancy. A level >40U/L is suggestive of tuberculosis. It is important to consider the result in the context of the patient as false positives and negatives can occur (no test in medicine is 100% reliable) but it can help support the clinical suspicion of one disease over another.
 
So the patient underwent a thoracocentesis and as expected the biochemistry results showed an exudate. Microbiology confirmed the presence of lymphocytes but the Gram stain and ZN stain showed no bacteria. The cytology also showed lymphocytes. Whilst waiting for the tuberculosis culture and further cytology results the biochemists did the ADA test which showed a high ADA and the respiratory doctors made a diagnosis of tuberculosis and started treatment. Two weeks later the Microbiologists grew a mycobacterium which eventually confirmed the diagnosis of tuberculosis but we were much slower than the biochemists! Plenty of time for the Microbiologist to have an extra cup of tea and a biscuit!!! "If only there was a staff room…" I hear you cry!
Robert A. Thompson link
13/1/2018 11:32:09 pm

This is quite a teaching tool! Learning the ropes of Microbiology this term and will read this weekly. Great practical topics.

David
15/1/2018 01:57:43 pm

Hi Robert
I'm pleased you are finding this helpful. Let me know if you come across something you think might make a good blog topic and I'll see what I can do.
David

Makayla P. Messer
15/1/2018 04:12:19 am

With learning about microbiology this semester, it is very interesting to see all the things I am learning about actually go into good use instead of it being something that is just learned in a classroom. This was a very interesting read and I can't wait to see what is posted next week!

David
15/1/2018 01:59:16 pm

Hi Makayla
It's great when you see something academic suddenly take on a practical purpose... it makes you think all of that study was worthwhile after all :-) I'm glad you like the blog. If you come across something you think would make a good blog topic let me know and I'll see what I can do.
David

Makayla
18/1/2018 04:48:40 am

That would be awesome! I will see what I can come up with! I am currently a Nursing Student at Lincoln Memorial University and taking Microbiology as an online class! The topics you have posted these past two weeks have been really interesting! Thank you!

Makayla
18/1/2018 04:57:22 am

I think a good blog topic would be the importance of teaching microbiology to nursing students!

shawn
21/1/2018 10:00:32 pm

Great detective work by whoever discovered this. Are there biochemical tests for Streptococcus pneumonia, Streptococcus anginosus, etc, that you know of?

David
23/1/2018 08:50:20 am

Hi Shawn
I'm not aware of any biochemical tests that help detect the Streptococci however there is a urinary antigen test which can be helpful in the diagnosis of Streptococcus pneumoniae. It's like a pregnancy test and takes 15 minutes. It's a handy test but not 100% reliable as various bacteria can cross react giving positive tests but if you have pneumonia for certain and a positive test it's good. Nothing for the S. anginosus group tough... maybe there's a gap in the market there?!
Thanks for your comment and question.
Best wishes
David

Kellyn Hyatt
5/2/2018 07:37:00 pm

As already stated as a student currently of medical microbiology I find your blog easy to understand and relatable to my subject matter. The question that spurred this blog was not one that I would have ever considered. It's interesting to look at the steps to something instead of just knowing it happens.


Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Blog Author:

    David Garner
    Consultant Microbiologist
    Surrey, UK

    Please DO NOT advertise products and conferences on our website or blog

    Categories

    All
    Antibiotic Resistance
    Antibiotics
    Basic Concepts
    Clinical Scenarios
    Guidelines
    Infection Control
    In The News
    Microbiology

    Archives

    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    Antibiotic Resistance
    Antibiotics
    Basic Concepts
    Clinical Scenarios
    Guidelines
    Infection Control
    In The News
    Microbiology

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.