Microbiology Nuts & Bolts
  • Home
  • Basic Concepts
    • What is infection?
    • Normal flora
    • Diagnosing infection
  • Microbiology
    • Basic bacterial identification
    • Interpreting bacteriology results
    • Interpreting serology results
  • Infection Control
    • What is infection control?
    • Universal precautions
    • MRSA
    • Clostridium difficile
  • Clinical Scenarios
    • Respiratory infections
    • Urinary infections
    • GI infections >
      • D&V
      • CDAD
    • CNS infections
    • Skin & bone infections
    • Sepsis
  • Antibiotics
    • Antimicrobial Stewardship
    • How antibiotics work
    • How to choose an antibiotic?
    • Reviewing antibiotics
    • Antibiotic resistance
    • Testing antibiotic resistance
    • Penicillin allergy
    • Theraputic Drug Monitoring
  • Guidelines
  • Lectures & Lecture Notes
    • Medical Students
    • Curriculum for the Foundation Program
    • Foundation Year 1
    • Foundation Year 2
    • Other Lectures
  • The Bug Blog
  • Buy the book...
  • NEW Edition Updates
  • Peer Reviews
  • Our Facebook page
  • Want to know more?
  • Contact

BBC Panorama, Why Mum Died: Britain’s Sepsis Crisis

13/9/2017

 
​Did you see the BBC Panorama program about sepsis on television on Monday night? What did you think? Whilst the program, like any other form of media, was selective in what it said in order to tell a story I think it is good that it stirred up the debate around the management of sepsis again. Yes again, as the inadequate treatment of sepsis has been known about for over a decade! This is an area where some progress in the NHS has been made but more still needs to be done.
 
For me personally it was also great to see some of my old colleagues from Nottingham and the progress they have made in the management of sepsis; they have been working hard on this clinical problem for many years and take it very seriously. Their success is a result of their hard work and they deserve a lot of credit for what they have achieved.
Picture
So whilst it is good that the subject of sepsis was discussed on BBC Panorama the program highlighted to me a number of problems with the management of septic patients. In particular:
  • There is no clear definition of what sepsis is and healthcare staff in general do not recognise when patients are septic
  • Patients are often labelled as septic when they have an alternative diagnosis
  • Sometimes doctors forget that sepsis is managed through a combination of procedures but that one of the most important is to reverse the underlying reason for the sepsis
 
Recognising sepsis and the initial management of the septic patient
I have blogged about this before so I’m not going to go into detail here.
 
For more information on recognising and managing sepsis see:
  • Can you recognise a sick patient
  • Sepsis! Are bearded men more attractive than non-bearded men?
  • Microbiology Nuts & Bolts Clinical Scenarios - Sepsis
 
Sepsis is not difficult to recognise if you have it as one of your differential diagnoses. If you don’t consider it and disprove it then you will never successfully diagnose and treat it. Doctors have a responsibility to grasp this; it is one of the medical emergencies but, as I find with students coming through my teaching, medical schools are failing to teach this.
 
Sepsis has an underlying cause
Whilst watching the BBC Panorama program I was struck by how many of the programs contributors (not including the experts from Nottingham) used the term sepsis to mean a specific diagnosis. This is not the case. Sepsis is a group of symptoms and signs that indicate that a patient has a severe infection which is causing body organs to become dysfunctional. Sepsis is the body’s critical failure warning system alerting! The importance here is that ANY infection can cause sepsis; it is in itself NOT a specific diagnosis. Patients can be septic due to community acquired pneumonia (CAP), cellulitis, appendicitis, urinary tract infections (UTI), pancreatitis... these are the diagnosis; sepsis is the consequence.
 
In many hospitals in the UK the diagnosis of “sepsis” has become the most common reason for giving antibiotics. This is wrong. The most common reasons for giving antibiotics should be the most common bacterial infections such as UTI, CAP and cellulitis but instead these common diagnoses have all become “sepsis”. This is a significant problem; let me explain.
 
The reason why this is so important is that part of the management of sepsis is known as “source control”. It doesn’t matter how good you are at providing physiological support for a septic patient, if you don’t reverse the underlying cause they will die.
 
One of the patients in the BBC Panorama program appears to have had a UTI which had initially been managed in primary care before she became more unwell. She was admitted to hospital but when her condition deteriorated the antibiotics that had been prescribed weren’t given for a further three hours. Sadly the lady died within two days. The program discusses the hospitals failure to recognise how unwell this lady was and then having realised this they failed to give her treatment quickly enough. The program identifies that many hospitals are still not giving antibiotics even when they have identified sepsis.
 
Another story within the BBC Panorama program was about the terrible case of a lady who died from sepsis. Yes, it sounds like the healthcare staff failed to recognise how sick she was; they didn’t spot that she was septic. But further on in the documentary it is said that she had severe abdominal pain and eventually had a laparotomy and lots of dead bowel removed. There was a lot of criticism about not recognising that she was septic and not starting antibiotics quickly enough in this lady BUT I would also add that one of the main criticisms ought to be failing to make a specific diagnosis and then dealing with that diagnosis. It sounds like she had ischaemic bowel and therefore part of her management should have been an urgent laparotomy and bowel resection before she became so unwell. Waiting until she is septic to diagnose an ischemic bowel is never going to end well!
 
Other examples might be the patient septic from a pulmonary empyema who needs a chest drain to remove the pus, or a patient with necrotising fasciitis who needs surgery to resect the diseased soft tissue. This type of “source control” is essential in the management of septic patients and worryingly it is sometimes delayed or not done at all.
 
Antibiotics for the underlying cause of sepsis
Another reason why it is important to know the underlying diagnosis leading to sepsis is that the antibiotics for each condition are different. The antibiotics for CAP are different to the antibiotics for peritonitis which are different to the antibiotics for meningitis… but all these diagnoses can cause sepsis:
  • CAP might be treated with IV Amoxicillin PLUS IV Clarithromycin
  • Cellulitis might be treated with IV Flucloxacillin
  • Meningitis might be treated with high dose IV Ceftriaxone
  • UTI might be treated with IV Gentamicin
 
In the above scenarios it is important to start the patient on the correct treatment otherwise the patient will come to harm even though sepsis has been recognised. For example many hospitals now use IV Piptazobactam PLUS IV Gentamicin (often shortened to P&G) or, if the patient is allergic to beta-lactams, IV Teicoplanin PLUS IV Gentamicin PLUS IV Metronidazole (TM&G) for sepsis. These combinations of antibiotics are used when the source of sepsis is unknown and the doctors want to cover as broad a spectrum of possible causative bacteria as they can. If this was used in the above patients then the following would happen:
  • The patient with CAP – P&G would treat some of the possible causes but not Legionella pneumophila, Mycoplasma pneumoniae or Chlamydophila pneumoniae; TM&G would only cover Streptococcus pneumoniae and Staphylococcus aureus (Gentamicin does not get in to the chest well enough to treat pneumonia). In fact the Gentamicin would be completely unnecessary and any side effects or complications such as renal failure or hearing loss would be indefensible
  • The patient with cellulitis – P&G would provide less effective treatment for S. aureus in soft tissue; TM&G would treat the cellulitis but the Gentamicin and Metronidazole would be completely unnecessary and any side effects or complications such as renal failure or hearing loss would be indefensible
  • The patient with meningitis – neither P&G or TM&G would treat meningitis and the patient would either suffer brain damage or die, either way the choice of antibiotic would be indefensible
  • The patient with a UTI – both P&G and TM&G would treat the patient even if there would be unnecessary overlap from the Piptazobactam but the Teicoplanin and Metronidazole would offer no benefit and any side effects or complications such as renal failure or bone marrow suppression would be indefensible
 
Suggesting a “single golden bullet” approach is unfortunately not helpful. Whilst it is important to recognise a septic patient (your patient’s critical failure warning system is alerting) it is also important to realise that there is an underlying reason for the sepsis and that MUST be corrected as part of the management of that septic patient. If you don’t then you are not treating the sepsis.
Linda Lorber
14/9/2017 01:16:20 pm

Have you seen this study about treatment? Links below.
http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/03/23/521096488/doctor-turns-up-possible-treatment-for-deadly-sepsis

http://www.evms.edu/about_evms/administrative_offices/marketing_communications/publications/issue_9_4/sepsis.php

David
28/9/2017 10:04:37 am

Hi Linda
Thanks for the comment and links. I've not come across this before but it looks interesting. I'll have to get hold of the peer reviewed publication.
My concern about the websites reporting this is that as far as I can see they don't mention antibiotics, source control or resuscitation and I suspect that these were also a major part of this Doctors treatment protocol.
As the article says, if this makes a difference then it's a great observation and step forward.
We still need to get healthcare professionals to recognise sepsis in the first place though... oh well...
David

Virginia Coots
23/9/2017 10:06:16 pm

How, if you have a loved one in the hospital, can you advocated for them if the physicians won't search for the root problem? I am just now learning and am understanding a lot more than the lay person. If they have not studied biology and microbiology, how can they understand that the person has an underlying problem? People can research on the internet, but that is a horrible idea at times. They can ask different questions, but how are they to know what to ask?

David
28/9/2017 10:12:16 am

Hi Virginia
This is a great question and I'm not really sure of the answer. As a healthcare professional I often ask difficult questions when either myself or my family are in hospital and whilst I have tried to be open and honest at the time I have often ended up being labelled as a difficult patient or relative. I've even seen this written in my notes before!
I think it might be possible to come up with a series of questions that a relative could ask which might help. I'll give it some thought. Something that asks about basic observations and blood tests. The lay person wouldn't need to know the exact significance but could just know that if certain observations or values are reached then they should ask "is my relative septic?" and "what are you doing to reverse the underlying problem?".
You're right about the Internet being full of horror stories, unfortunately we have a negative bias as humans that attracts us to bad things, and so this is what the media give us.
Thanks for the question and the idea of producing some simple way of giving to relatives to ask the right questions.
David

Kassidy Fugate
7/10/2017 02:27:56 pm

Every time I hear someone talk about someone in the hospital being sepsis, I automatically think there is no coming back from sepsis so it is the end for them. Is there anyone that has had sepsis and came back from it? Is there a certain severity it has to be before it cannot be treated like any other disease?

David
10/10/2017 09:25:42 am

Hi Kassidy
With medical intervention most septic patients should survive. It is often quoted that for every hour (up to 6 hours) treatment is delayed after admission to hospital 7% of patients will die; that means that 40% will die if treatment is delayed 6 hours. But this isn't everyone. Most patients who receive treatment at some time will survive, the problem is that if the treatment is quick and targeted at the underlying problem then almost all will survive... and this is where we are falling down as a profession.

It is true that without any help almost all patients who are septic will die. It is theoretically possible at least that if someone was septic from an abscess that spontaneously drained itself then they might survive but it would be a rare scenario.

So basically, early targeted treatment increases survival.

Hope that answers your question.

David

JJ
22/10/2017 10:11:59 am

After 10 weeks of oral antibiotics for erysipelas, and being told it was NOT due to CA-MRSA, I was started on teicoplanin. Just before the third dose I noticed my urine was foamy. Oral temperature increased to 37.9C (unusually high for me, as I'm hypothyroid) and heart rate doubled. The District Nurse handed over to 111, and an Advanced Practitioner arrived two hours later, by which time I was slowing mentally. I told the AP that my hypothyroidism and bradycardia may skew the diagnosis, and my concern about sepsis, but was told to take paracetamol and didn't receive the antibiotic. Thankfully, my temp and heart rate normalized (for me!) within a few hours, but I am aware that the gains against the infection have been lost, and the District Nurse hasn't yet returned...

JJ
22/10/2017 10:27:47 am

"If you know why Teicoplanin is wrongly used to treat UTIs, do let me know." (Teicoplanin is active against “LESS” bacteria than you think! - 13/1/2014).

See Section 4.1 http://www.sanofi-aventis.co.uk/products/Targocid_400mg_SPC.pdf


Comments are closed.

    RSS Feed

    Blog Author:

    David Garner
    Consultant Microbiologist
    Surrey, UK

    Please DO NOT advertise products and conferences on our website or blog

    Categories

    All
    Antibiotic Resistance
    Antibiotics
    Basic Concepts
    Clinical Scenarios
    Guidelines
    Infection Control
    In The News
    Microbiology

    Archives

    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    July 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    April 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    February 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    August 2013
    July 2013

    Categories

    All
    Antibiotic Resistance
    Antibiotics
    Basic Concepts
    Clinical Scenarios
    Guidelines
    Infection Control
    In The News
    Microbiology

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.